Van Trier

  • Date
    4 december 2012
  • Social:
    Facebook
Close

Rio+20: Take science seriously and change the process

The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), could have brought us closer to a strengthened earth system governance. Closer towards a global, effective architecture for governance of sustainability that can adapt to changing circumstances, that involves civil society, that is accountable and legitimate beyond the nation state and that is fair for everyone.

It could have been. But the negotiated text agreed before the conference is weak. It falls behind expectations of most countries, and is disappointing to practically all civil society organisations. The global intergovernmental negotiation process has failed. Again.

In a recent blog-contribution two renowned scientists affiliated to the Earth System Governance Project, Steinar Andresen (The Fridtjof Nansen Institute), and Arild Underdal (University of Oslo and CICERO) therefore concluded that “we do not need to bringing thousands of participants to a series of mega-conferences to confirm that the range of politically feasible solutions is quite narrow”.

This is certainly true when measuring the Rio+20 Conference against what it is on paper: A meeting of UN member states. But there is more Rio+20 than just a few days of intergovernmental get-together. The Rio+20 Conference is the climax and a catalyser of the multi-year process it is embedded in. This process involves more than diplomats and international bureaucracies. It includes countless actors ranging from business associations, to youth movements, major group representatives, regional organisations, alliances of cities, corporate leaders, and many NGOs.

The Rio+20 Process also has strong involvement from the global scientific community. Scientists provide evidence of the environmental, social, and economic state of society and the planet; advise national delegations and NGOs, analyse the negotiation process as such, and not least bring their research findings as policy recommendations into the process.

Recommendations to Rio+20 

Social scientists have made substantial progress in identifying the factors that foster the creation of international environmental treaties and pointed out the significant potential for incremental improvement to get better treaties sooner. They suggest conducting negotiations within existing institutions, splitting problems into smaller packages, or having a stronger reliance on qualified majority voting. Political systems that rely on majority-based decision-making arrive at more far-reaching decisions more quickly.

These recommendations are taken from an assessment of the state of knowledge in the social sciences by a group 32 researchers affiliated to the Earth System Governance Project – a global research alliance. This assessment has been published as policy brief for the Planet under Pressure Conference and as scientific article in Science and in longer version in Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

Other recommendations for Rio+20 by the Earth System Governance Project include:

  • creating multilaterally harmonised systems that allow for discriminating between products on the basis of production processes, hence enabling trade policies that favour more sustainably produced products. Under current global trade law, this is not possible
  • developing or strengthening regulatory frameworks for emerging technologies in water, food and energy
  • upgrading the United Nations Environment Programme to a specialised UN agency
  • improving national governance
  • strengthening and streamlining public–private governance networks and partnerships
  • and crucially, strengthen accountability and legitimacy.

The gap between knowledge and action

Despite many studies and recommendations from the scientific community, and various references to the importance of research and technology in the current Rio+20 outcome text, the Rio+20 process has not systematically taken up research findings. It has ignored those on strengthening governance and improving policy processes, and those from natural sciences that provide clear evidence for the need for urgent and transformative change.

This again illustrates what we know all too well: having adequate and appropriate knowledge does not necessarily lead to requisite actions. In the gap between knowledge and action lie crucial issues. It is not only how knowledge is produced and by whom, but equally crucially how knowledge is framed and communicated by whom for what purpose and in what context, and how it is learned and understood by relevant stakeholders.

We must continue rigorous, curiosity-driven interdisciplinary social science research on options for a strengthened institutional framework for sustainable development in the time beyond the failed Rio+20 Conference. But the global change research community also has to strengthen and improve its efforts in communicating its findings to policy makers and other stakeholders in order to close the gap between knowledge and action.

This article is written on personal title and has been originally published on 21 June 2012 by The Conversation.

  • Reviewed by:
    Editor (articles & opinion)
  • Author:
    Ruben Zondervan
  • Published:
    2012
  • Posted in:
    Articles

Articles

The Anthropocene: A new era in the history of Planet Earth in which the human species is a main driver of global environmental change. Planetary Boundaries: Thresholds in […]

Continue reading →

View all

Articles

The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), could have brought us closer to a strengthened earth system governance. Closer towards a global, effective architecture for governance of […]

Continue reading →

View all

Articles

Ontwikkelingen in het onderwijs onder Khomeini, Khatami en Ahmadinejad in de Islamitische Republiek Iran. Onderwerp Onderwijsbeleid en de dynamiek onder de jeugdige bevolking in het onderwijsveld in Iran […]

Continue reading →

View all

Book review

Lux Voor schrijft een boek. Een “Handleiding voor de toekomst”, voor Nederland en ook voor Europa. Maar wie, of wat is Lux Voor? Geen politieke partij, geen vereniging […]

Continue reading →

View all

Book review

Baruch, of ook wel Benedict, de Spinoza, zoon van joods-Portugese immigranten, was lensenslijper en leefde aan het eind van de 17e eeuw in de Nederlanden. Maar bovenal was […]

Continue reading →

View all

Book review

“Et tu, Brutus?!” Wie kent ze niet, de legendarische laatste woorden van Julius Caesar? Of hij ze werkelijk gesproken heeft en over de toedracht in de dagen rond […]

Continue reading →

View all

Book review

‘Actief pluralism’ is een term die in de afgelopen jaren een vaste plek heeft gekregen in Belgische beleidsdocumenten. Bedoeld als tegenstelling tot voorheen gangbare opvatting over tolerantie als […]

Continue reading →

View all

Book review

Van het politieke wel en wee worden dagelijks vele spotprenten gemaakt, waarvan Koos van Weringh een fervent verzamelaar is. Inmiddels heeft hij dan ook meerdere verzamelingen van spotprenten […]

Continue reading →

View all

Book review

Waarheen leidt ons het begrip dat wij hebben van de werkelijkheid en de wereld om ons? De wiskundige, filosoof en theoloog J.J.W. Berghuys stelt vast dat wij met […]

Continue reading →

View all

Book review

Het twistgesprek, gepubliceerd in “Woher eine Ethik nehmen?”, vond al in 1974 als briefwisseling plaats tussen Mächler en Marti en verscheen voor het eerst in de Basler National […]

Continue reading →

View all

Book review

Tegenwoordig lijkt de toekomst van de Europese Unie synoniem te staan met heikele zaken als het ´Nee´ van Frankrijk en Nederland tegen de grondwet en de controverse omtrent […]

Continue reading →

View all

Projects

Tanzperformance: Gesetzeskraft – En force de loi Veranstalter: 48 Stunden Neukölln Festival (http://www.48-stunden-neukoelln.de/2013/) Zeit: Samstag 15.6.13, Einlass ab 20:00 bis Dunkelheit Ort: Friedhofskapelle, Lilienthalstraße 7 Produktion: Little strategies […]

Continue reading →

View all

Projects

Berlin based Finnish Photographer Janne Tervonen is working and living in Berlin since 2008. Documenting Berlin metropolitan obscure and hidden corners, seen from is very individual angle. Absolutely […]

Continue reading →

View all